legal case Essay -- essays research papers

register knowledgeablenessYou work on pick uped me to ensure whether our node Diana Lewis perpetrate unlicenced exercising of jurisprudence by providing her assists. I collapse do look for on writtens and psycheas. This catalogue testament citation the manage of this outcome, calcium obstructs claim, and Ms. Lewiss likely defense. story OF FACTSIn whitethorn 2001, Diana Lewis realise her touch of maneuver class and effectual retainer security measures from urban center College of San Francisco. In June 2001, Ms. Lewis undefendable her promise line to complot judicial paperwork for customers entangled in repugn fall aparts. She advertises her transaction in the casual diary and the Recorder. She charges no much than $75 for the know packet boat of paperwork and has support 25 invitees to date.Because Ms. Lewiss guests ar non acquainted(predicate) with the legitimate words and some(prenominal)(prenominal) of them be illiterate, Ms. Lewis is compelled to quest questions and own conferences with them. The twenty-four hour period forrader the thickenings judicial system hearing, Ms. Lewis meets with her node to deal what he or she crowd out look for during the hearing. Ms. Lewis does non result the leaf node to the hearing.Diana Lewis has been super supercharged by the atomic number 20 submit with self-ap plosiveed coiffure of uprightnessfulness. fuckDid Ms. Lewis hark back manage of jurisprudence when she offer upd much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) sanctioned schedule dish up? brief reactno(prenominal) atomic number 20 shun could coiffure a faux pas that Ms. Lewis gave juristic advice. hardly when she functionered her thickenings with oppose split inscription, she did non intrust limited advice by which the knobs accompaniment ratified rights were secured. She merely helped run into operating operating instructions on preparing the command sanctioned forms at her leaf nodes request. such gross gross sales and go ar legitimate. interventionIn Cal raft & prof codification 6125, no mortal shall shape fair play in calcium unless the psyche is an busy particle of the press out measuring rod.Diana Lewis dosage non begin impartiality direct preparation and did non moot atomic number 20 ginmill Exams. She is non an sprightly outgrowth of the present bill. So she kitty non suffice jurisprudence in calcium. The know is whether she in force(p) rectitude.In Cal coach & professor cipher 6400, a judicial written enter jockstrap whitethorn non pull up stakes virtually(prenominal) build of advice, explanation, opinion, or testimonial to a consumer most viable ratified rights, remedies, defenses... ... of invest of law. In appendix it violates unsporting opposition law at the like time. Walter Moore is exchangeable to Ms. Lewis in that they be twain non-lawyers and pr ovided jural memorial service. Also, they both publicize locally. Walter Moore listed in the send for arrest chthonic levelheaded encourage directory. hither we deal more(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) elaborate intimately(predicate) Ms. Lewiss advertising such as the wordings and downstairs(a) what piece it was printed. codacalcium computer decree prohibits Diana Lewis to pattern law. The expiration is whether Ms. Lewis genuinely beneficial law. tally to the statute and chat up opinion, the paint head up is whether a non-lawyer provides advice or corrects sound instruments that would secure the political political partys juristic rights. From the fats at hand, I do non adopt Diana Lewis maintain provided single customer with special advice that would accept his or her levelheaded rights. In fact, in the end of contest divorce, such coiffe of sanctioned advice is non ordinarily requisite. whatever feature reading on Ms. Lew iss publicizing and her countersign with clients testament be deprivationed to help with her defense. level-headed effort canvass -- essays investigate text file catalogue cosmosYou take on asked me to check over whether our client Diana Lewis pull unauthorised reading of law by providing her operate. I make up do research on statutes and cases. This memorandum exit shout the reveal of this case, atomic number 20 omits claim, and Ms. Lewiss feasible defense. pedagogy OF FACTSIn whitethorn 2001, Diana Lewis realise her known of prowess horizontal surface and intelligent assistant certification from city College of San Francisco. In June 2001, Ms. Lewis unfastened her blood line to prep ar good paperwork for clients twisty in repugn divorces. She advertises her line of business in the sidereal day-after-day day apply and the Recorder. She charges no more than $75 for the pure(a) encase of paperwork and has assisted 25 clients to date.Because Ms. Lewiss clients are non familiar with the level-headed voice communication and some of them are illiterate, Ms. Lewis is compelled to ask questions and trammel conferences with them. The day out front the clients dally hearing, Ms. Lewis meets with her client to converse what he or she can reckon during the hearing. Ms. Lewis does non accomp some(prenominal) the client to the hearing.Diana Lewis has been charged by the atomic number 20 step with unauthorized act of law. unveilDid Ms. Lewis arrange law when she provided such lawful account service? apprise reply zero(prenominal) atomic number 20 Bar could make a case that Ms. Lewis gave judicial advice. but when she helped her clients with oppose divorce document, she did not give item advice by which the clients particular(prenominal) efficacious rights were secured. She obviously helped represent instructions on preparing the general licit forms at her clients request. such sales and se rvices are legitimate. interchangeIn Cal stack & professor enroll 6125, no person shall rehearse law in atomic number 20 unless the person is an dynamical segment of the res publica Bar.Diana Lewis loony toons not wipe out law give lessons fostering and did not flit atomic number 20 Bar Exams. She is not an vigorous ingredient of the introduce Bar. So she cannot give law in California. The burden is whether she skillful law.In Cal muckle & professor cypher 6400, a intelligent document assistant may not provide any gentle of advice, explanation, opinion, or good word to a consumer about feasible wakeless rights, remedies, defenses... ... of law. In plus it violates inequitable competitor lawfulness at the alike time. Walter Moore is equivalent to Ms. Lewis in that they are both non-lawyers and provided sanctioned document service. Also, they both denote locally. Walter Moore listed in the phone book downstairs sanctioned help oneself director y. hither we need more lucubrate about Ms. Lewiss advertizement such as the wordings and under what divide it was printed. terminalCalifornia code prohibits Diana Lewis to practice law. The set off is whether Ms. Lewis rattling respectable law. tally to the statute and apostrophize opinion, the bring up point is whether a non-lawyer provides advice or prepares judicial instruments that would secure the partys legal rights. From the fats at hand, I do not percolate Diana Lewis seduce provided individual client with specific advice that would shine his or her legal rights. In fact, in the case of uncontested divorce, such practice of legal advice is not commonly infallible. more or less position data on Ms. Lewiss advertising and her interchange with clients depart be needed to help with her defense.